Strive for…the holiness without which no one will see the Lord. ~Hebrews 12:14 Anne Hutchinson This list below was published in a few blogs, notably by Kevin DeYoung at The Gospel Coalition. Mark Jones originally brought the list to our attention with his important book Antinomianism: Reformed Theology’s Unwelcome Guest. It is a set of …
Tag Archives: Reformed Orthodoxy
Getting the Starting Points Right
Richard Muller has provocatively titled his section on “the beginnings of prolegomena” as “Setting the Stage after the Production—on the Construction of Prolegomena”. We exist in our own time (just as the post-Reformation writers existed in their own time). The challenge for Christians today (as was the challenge for them, in their day) was, “what …
The Development of Theological Prolegomena
I’ve been posting selections from Richard Muller’s “Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics” series here for about six months now. What Muller has reported in earlier chapters is mere overview – in terms of the history and development of Reformed Orthodoxy – have been the continuities and discontinuities between the Medieval period of theology, and the Post-Reformation (especially …
Continue reading “The Development of Theological Prolegomena”
The Breadth Of The Reformed Orthodox Phenomenon
The Calvinist philosopher Paul Helm has recently published a brief review or commentary on Oliver Crisp’s “Deviant Calvinism” on the discussion between “freedom of the will” and “state of grace”. He states the issue: “An attempt will be made to show not that there are two rival metaphysical views of human freedom side by side …
Continue reading “The Breadth Of The Reformed Orthodox Phenomenon”
Doctrine and Method in the Era of High Orthodoxy (ca. 1640–1685–1725)
1. General characteristics. The period following 1640 and extending, in two phases, into the beginning of the eighteenth century can be called the period of high orthodoxy, defined most clearly by further changes in the style of dogmatics. The architectonic clarity of early orthodoxy is replaced to a certain extent or at least put to …
Continue reading “Doctrine and Method in the Era of High Orthodoxy (ca. 1640–1685–1725)”
Trajectories in Aristotelianism and Rationalism in Early Reformed Orthodoxy
I am often asked, “at a time when there is a flood of people leaving Roman Catholicism, why does it seem that so many intellectuals seem to be moving in the opposite direction?” There are a number of reasons for this – some Anglicans are converting because of the rampant liberalism and decline in morality …
Continue reading “Trajectories in Aristotelianism and Rationalism in Early Reformed Orthodoxy”
The Geographic Expansion of Post-Reformation Orthodoxy
International dimensions and interrelationships in the rise of Reformed orthodoxy. It is also during the early orthodox period that Reformed theology assumed truly international dimensions. The systems of Calvin, Vermigli, Musculus, and Bullinger had extensive circulation not only in Switzerland but also in German Reformed territories, the Netherlands, and England. Writers of the third and …
Continue reading “The Geographic Expansion of Post-Reformation Orthodoxy”
Natural Theology 2: Calvin’s Conception of the Knowledge of God
Jacob Aitken writes, “Any discussion of the imago-dei (“Image of God” in man) is better served, not by speculating on essences and accidents, but on man’s role as priest-king-prophet in creation and New Creation”. Down below, you’ll see much the same conclusion from Muller regarding Calvin’s understanding of the imago dei: it must be informed …
Continue reading “Natural Theology 2: Calvin’s Conception of the Knowledge of God”
Echoes of Scotus, Ockham, and Eck in the Reformed Orthodox discussion of faith and reason
On this topic, I present what Muller has to say, without comment: Medieval Antecedents to the Reformed Discussion The Reformed orthodox debate echoes the debate over the Scotist distinction between the infinite and perfect theologia in se and the various forms of finite theology typical of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On the one hand, …
Aquinas gets this wrong, and much confusion follows
There are a lot of moving parts in this discussion, I admit. Here we have a discussion about a concept, in which the discussion moves from Aristotle to Aquinas to Scotus to Luther to Calvin to Turretin and Warfield. In my recent blog post, Luther’s Theology of the Cross and Metaphysics, I cited Muller as …
Continue reading “Aquinas gets this wrong, and much confusion follows”